In 1950, US Secretary of State Dean Acheson outlined American army commitments in japanese Asia, hoping to discourage Soviet and Chinese language communist growth. What turned often called the “Acheson Line” notably excluded Korea and Taiwan and, inadvertently, knowledgeable communist powers the place they might broaden with out US resistance, resulting in quick penalties such because the Korean Battle and many years of communist growth. The Acheson Line’s failure to incorporate Taiwan has led to unresolved points, with China now looking for to reclaim the island nation underneath its authoritarian rule. To stop a repeat of the Acheson Line’s errors, america should undertake a long-term technique that helps Taiwan’s sovereignty and invests in its self-defense capabilities whereas projecting power and sustaining a dedicated presence to curb China’s ambitions.
You should definitely go to The Hoover Establishment at https://www.hoover.org/ and PolicyEd at https://www.policyed.org/
Examine Out Extra from Col. Henry Brown:
Learn “Battling the Numbers: South Korea’s Navy Downsizes Amid Difficult Demographic Panorama” from Henry Brown right here:
https://thediplomat.com/2024/03/battling-the-numbers-south-koreas-military-downsizes-amid-challenging-demographic-landscape/
Learn “One battle, one speech, and one aggressive, rising China” from Henry Brown right here:
https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4018988-one-war-one-speech-and-one-aggressive-rising-china/
Study extra about Col. Henry Brown right here:
https://www.hoover.org/news/qa-col-henry-c-brown-us-army-national-security-affairs-fellow
Examine Out Extra on Deterrence:
Watch “Deterrence in Overseas Coverage: Classes from World Battle II” from Victor Davis Hanson right here:
https://www.policyed.org/unarchived/deterrence-foreign-policy-lessons-world-war-ii/video
Watch “Deterrence by Denial” from H.R. McMaster right here:
https://www.policyed.org/perspectivesonpolicy/deterrence-denial/video
Learn the e book “Deterrence: Its Previous and Future” from George P. Schultz, Sidney D. Gown, and James Goodby right here:
https://www.hoover.org/research/deterrence-its-past-and-future-papers-presented-hoover-institution-november-2010
The opinions expressed on this web site are these of the authors and don’t essentially mirror the opinions of the Hoover Establishment or Stanford College.
© 2024 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior College.
source
Elbridge Colby's fainting couch.
TAIWAN NUMBA ONE!
Over-including nations within an Achesonian sphere of protection may likewise result in an even more dangerous hot war should the West’s bluff be called. Strategic ambiguity (ie not disclosing at all what the precise threshold for intervention is) may be the best policy here. Would love to see discussion from Hoover fellows on this matter.
The U.S. can’t protect the world from communism. In fact 50% of US citizens voted for Markixt WOKE communism. The U.S. couldn’t protect itself from Stalin, Mao communism.. it can’t protect Taiwan.
Taiwan is a sovereign country. Keep your paws of it, Jingping
Chinese should be able to deal with this themselves. US should stop mainland from using force against free China.
You have omitted the one China rule in your statements. Taiwan is still recognised by all nations to be 100% in China’s nation. It is America who wants to ‘force’ Taiwan out of this agreement for their own devious plan of war in the Pacific. America already has 9 military bases surrounding China. Maybe China should do the same in South America, I’m sure that those countries would financially gain by this move of copying the USA!!! NZ. We don’t want your war in our Pacific Ocean.
some picture is wrong Kimmen and Matsu is Taiwan’s territory.
"As China looks to coercively bring Taiwan BACK under its control…" Hey, Hoover Institution, "back" implies that Taiwan was previously under China's control. It wasn't. Lay off the Kool-Aid.
"As China looks to coersively bring Taiwan back under its control" — Nope! China never controlled Taiwan. Taiwan controlled China.